who was right :: essays papers

who was decentWhen uninfected custody crossed the boundary of the minute River, it upset the balance between the pioneers and the red men. Obviously the red men were not happy and lashed out against their white oppressors. Many just truism savages, but much of the American army saw courage and honor. Was it right for members of the army who had just maintained the union of their own society, to dismember the assimilation of the Native Americans? I believe it was. First of all, the army did not whoop it up having to push the Indians back from the discharges that the white people wanted, but then they to a fault had to try and convert them to Christianity. The Indians retaliated against the army, but it was the United States government itself that broke the treaties that promised the Indians land and then expected the army to keep the peace through interchangeable trust. Military action appeared to be the only personal manner to keep white civilians from complaining sli ghtly Indian attacks on the white mans newly acquired land. An army official named Sheridan received reports each week about the horrendous acts of hysteria caused by the red man. It was then that famous phrase was created the only safe Indians I ever saw were dead. There were many men homogeneous Sheridan who hated the Indians and looked down upon their senseless acts of violence. However, men the sames of William Tecumseh Sherman had a tardily respect and admiration for the enemy and his fighting skill. In fact, both Sheridan and Sherman confessed to pardon and compassion for the Native Americans they had set out to destroy. Even men like General Nelson A. Miles who had personal reasons for revenge against the enemy showed a deep respect, most reverence, for the red man. Colonel John Gibbon proclaimed that the record of white hatred and treachery would force any man to fight. Gibbon raised to a greater extent questions about his own culture than he answered about hi s enemies. To many soldiers who had the analogous ideals as Gibbon, the courage and bearing of the red man suggested a purer way of life before the coming of the white men. Some men like General George Crook became more of an Indian than some Apaches. Crooks argument about the Indian violence was that their nature is responsive to treatment which assures him that it is based upon justice, truth, honesty, and crude sense.