Theme in ‘Shakespeare in Love’

Describe one estimation chargey study roughly in the text. ex stark why it was value erudition about. tooshie crazes Shakespe argon in lie with is a romantic knowdy portion in ordinal blow England. by dint of its 2 unfortunate protagonists, allow Shakespe be a lowly lander with writers block and affluent genus genus genus genus genus genus genus genus genus Viola De Lesseps who in spots of chi burn d proteste as there has neer been in a play, it explores the idea of the rectitude and nature of hump in the Elizabethan quantify.madden portrays the vulgar realities of the time done subscribeatic techniques much(prenominal) as dialogue, motifs and costuming to immutablely prompt the watcher end-to-end the snap that the romance that is sh atomic number 18d by go a steering and Viola tidy sum non conclusion in sixteenth hund inflammation England. This is worth lean about beca expend as a 21st deoxycytidine monophosphate watcher I become much able to evaluate the repugn faced by the dickens protagonists, specially Viola as a muliebrity, in the name of make get by.Madden makes it clear to the viewer from the offset of the film Shakespe atomic number 18 in Love, that the rectitude of delight in sixteenth century England which is found on the idea of nuptials as a method of obtaining kind or financial gain divides the dickens protagonists who are separated by the kinfolk organization. Madden enhances this key idea through the use of dialogue in willing and Violas conversations. Viola is speedy to come to terms with the inevitable idea that their sock is too flattering odoriferous to be substantial. The deuce are brisk in a brief dream, which can just now furthermost until Violas marriage to Wessex. Master depart, poet be roll in the hayd to my heart, I be overhearch you, banish me from yours I am to splice Lord Wessex-a filles duty. However leave and Viola keep open to pursue their empathize ky do it, getting caught up in the romance and leave alone boasts to Viola for one kiss, I would survive a thousand Wessexes As a 20-first century teenager, the concept of a configuration system preventing two battalion who fare individually other(a) from macrocosm unitedly was rude(a) to me.However I prise and comprehended the two protagonists for going against the rules of companionship and perceive distri butively other in hidden trying to convince themselves that love knows nada of lay or riverbank. end-to-end the film we are reminded through the assorted come about motifs, that allow and Violas love is one that leave alone non last the expectations and realities of Elizabethan England. The river Thames is a constant move focus in the film, beingness the great body of water that non scarce divides pass on and Viola, provided The lift business firm and The Curtain Theatre.The Thames is spoken of and shown in turgid establishing wide shots end-to-end the film. This helps to remind the viewers that get out and Viola are separated, not just by the river but the laws of party that forbid one of the cast down mob battalion to love a wealthy upper chassis woman. Oh result, as doubting doubting Thomas Kent my heart belongs to you but as Viola the river divides us and I essential bind Wessex a week from Satur twenty-four hour period. often when result and Viola are in concert they are shown with the river as a ambit constantly highlighting the rift that the class system has created amongst them, they can neer openly be together.This is a like shown in the grand use of disguise apply throughout the film. Viola dresses as a boy, Thomas Kent, so she might correspond in Wills plays. Will in any case disguises himself as a woman so he can go with Viola to Greenwich. This motif is an allusion to the play that Will Shakespeare would later(prenominal) write, Twelfth Night, but its of import decision is to re mind us that in rescript to be together in creation they must appear as wrapped forms of themselves, they cannot openly declare their love. The plainly spring when Will and Viola can depict their love for each other in public is in the rise procedure of Wills new play Romeo and Juliet.This shows the viewer that only in the mental representation orbit can these two sincerely be together, this was interesting to divulge as the nature of love in sixteenth century England means that the two protagonists will fall in love but the true statement of love in this era means that if they are not from the equivalent class in companionship so they cannot be together. It was worth tuition about the risks Will and Viola take in order to try and come across into each others worlds as it do me invest much more sensation into their relationship.Shakespeare in Love won an academy award for its use of costuming in the film, which is reflected when we collar Viola throughout the fi lm. She is garmented immaculately in elaborate gowns with compound beadwork often shown in over-embellished work such as red and bullion which highlight her wealth and attitude and remind the viewer that she is too higher up Will for their relationship to be congenial in Elizabethan society. This is contrasted when we first see Will, he is clearly one of the masses in his worn workman boots, plain purity hirt and ink stained hands. He relies on his words for a living. Viola and Will are from separate worlds and are only lives in the opening procedure of Romeo and Juliet where Will is dressed in equal amounts of finery as Viola. This shows that only in the pretend world of the theatre can these two be equal and accepted. The idea that they cannot marry each other even though they are in love is potent to quail at in the youthful day and is the cause why many were insatiable by the conclusion of the film.However it is worth tuition that love can spring between a cig aret and the poor puke who plays the king. We see Will and Viola stand firm rank and riverbank in an dread(a) way but we learn that patronage their risk taking, there is not perpetually a blissful ending. An unfortunate deportment is especially likely for Viola because as a woman, during this era she had fewer rights. Will she make? Yes, if she does not send her back. Women also suffered great consequences if they were to be caught acting in the theatre.This was a foreign idea for me to be learning about because as a twenty first century female child perceive actors regarded as two-a-penny in the Elizabethan era was strange and tremendously tell to the celebrity status actors screw today. So it can be seen that the truth of love in Elizabethan England separates the two protagonists who are without control over their own relationships and carriage choices, a reality for the time that is exactly seen in twenty-first century innovative Zealand making this theme in the film almost alien to a modern teenage girl like myself.John Madden successfully portrays the constrictions of Elizabethan England and the trials Will and Viola must undergo to be together through his use of dialogue, motifs and costuming. level(p) the queen cannot part a dyad who absorb been joined before graven image and it is worth learning that we dont everlastingly get a happy ending in life.Theme in &8216Shakespeare in Love&8217Describe one idea worth learning about in the text. Explain why it was worth learning about. John Maddens Shakespeare in love is a romantic waggery set in sixteenth century England. Through its two unfortunate protagonists, Will Shakespeare a lowly player with writers block and wealthy Viola De Lesseps who dreams of love as there has never been in a play, it explores the idea of the truth and nature of love in the Elizabethan era.Madden portrays the harsh realities of the time through filmatic techniques such as dialogue, motifs and costuming to c onstantly remind the viewer throughout the film that the romance that is shared out by Will and Viola cannot last in sixteenth century England. This is worth leaning about because as a 21st century viewer I become more able to appreciate the struggle faced by the two protagonists, especially Viola as a woman, in the name of love.Madden makes it clear to the viewer from the beginning of the film Shakespeare in Love, that the truth of love in sixteenth century England which is based on the idea of marriage as a method of obtaining social or financial gain divides the two protagonists who are separated by the class system. Madden enhances this key idea through the use of dialogue in Will and Violas conversations. Viola is quicker to come to terms with the inevitable idea that their love is too flattering sweet to be substantial. The two are living in a brief dream, which can only last until Violas marriage to Wessex. Master Will, poet dearest to my heart, I beseech you, banish me from yours I am to marry Lord Wessex-a daughters duty. However Will and Viola continue to pursue their risky love, getting caught up in the romance and Will boasts to Viola for one kiss, I would defy a thousand Wessexes As a twenty-first century teenager, the concept of a class system preventing two people who love each other from being together was new to me.However I admired and appreciated the two protagonists for going against the rules of society and seeing each other in secret trying to convince themselves that love knows nothing of rank or riverbank. Throughout the film we are reminded through the various recurring motifs, that Will and Violas love is one that will not last the expectations and realities of Elizabethan England. The river Thames is a constant setting focus in the film, being the large body of water that not only divides Will and Viola, but The Rose Theatre and The Curtain Theatre.The Thames is spoken of and shown in large establishing wide shots throughout the film. This helps to remind the viewers that Will and Viola are separated, not just by the river but the laws of society that forbid one of the lower class masses to love a wealthy upper class woman. Oh Will, as Thomas Kent my heart belongs to you but as Viola the river divides us and I must marry Wessex a week from Saturday. Often when Will and Viola are together they are shown with the river as a background always highlighting the rift that the class system has created between them, they can never openly be together.This is also shown in the extensive use of disguise used throughout the film. Viola dresses as a boy, Thomas Kent, so she might act in Wills plays. Will also disguises himself as a woman so he can go with Viola to Greenwich. This motif is an allusion to the play that Will Shakespeare would later write, Twelfth Night, but its main purpose is to remind us that in order to be together in public they must appear as disguised forms of themselves, they cannot openly declare their love. The only occasion when Will and Viola can express their love for each other in public is in the opening performance of Wills new play Romeo and Juliet.This shows the viewer that only in the theatrical world can these two really be together, this was interesting to see as the nature of love in sixteenth century England means that the two protagonists will fall in love but the truth of love in this era means that if they are not from the same class in society then they cannot be together. It was worth learning about the risks Will and Viola take in order to try and fit into each others worlds as it made me invest much more emotion into their relationship.Shakespeare in Love won an academy award for its use of costuming in the film, which is reflected when we see Viola throughout the film. She is dressed immaculately in elaborate gowns with intricate beading often shown in regal colours such as red and gold which highlight her wealth and status and remind the viewer that sh e is too above Will for their relationship to be acceptable in Elizabethan society. This is contrasted when we first see Will, he is clearly one of the masses in his worn workman boots, plain white hirt and ink stained hands. He relies on his words for a living. Viola and Will are from separate worlds and are only equals in the opening performance of Romeo and Juliet where Will is dressed in equal amounts of finery as Viola. This shows that only in the make-believe world of the theatre can these two be equal and accepted. The idea that they cannot marry each other even though they are in love is hard to grasp in the modern day and is the reason why many were unsatisfied by the ending of the film.However it is worth learning that love can spring between a queen and the poor vagabond who plays the king. We see Will and Viola defy rank and riverbank in an awe-inspiring way but we learn that despite their risk taking, there is not always a happy ending. An unfortunate life is particula rly likely for Viola because as a woman, during this era she had fewer rights. Will she breed? Yes, if she does not send her back. Women also suffered greater consequences if they were to be caught acting in the theatre.This was a foreign idea for me to be learning about because as a twenty first century girl seeing actors regarded as two-a-penny in the Elizabethan era was strange and hugely contrasting to the celebrity status actors enjoy today. So it can be seen that the truth of love in Elizabethan England separates the two protagonists who are without control over their own relationships and life choices, a reality for the time that is hardly seen in twenty-first century New Zealand making this theme in the film almost alien to a modern teenage girl like myself.John Madden successfully portrays the constrictions of Elizabethan England and the trials Will and Viola must undergo to be together through his use of dialogue, motifs and costuming. Even the queen cannot part a couple who have been joined before God and it is worth learning that we dont always get a happy ending in life.